Skip to main content

Star Trek Beyond (2016)

Source
Written by Scotty himself (Simon Pegg) and Doug Jung, Star Trek Beyond is the first of the revamped series not to be helmed by JJ Abrams. Fast & Furious director Justin Lin directs this time, and it’s fair to say the trailers for this were pretty rubbish, painting it to be nothing more than one elaborate action scene after another… or Fast & Furious in space (at least the poster campaign was superb). Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto et al reprise their roles, this time joined by Sofia Boutella and Idris Elba.

Following an attack on the ship, the majority of the story plays out with the Enterprises’ crew split up and divided from each other on the planet Altamid. I enjoyed this as it forced entertaining interactions between characters that we hadn’t seen in such prolonged close proximity. Where this works the best is with Spock and Karl Urban’s grizzly Bones. I always thought Urban had taken a back seat in the previous two instalments, making way for The Kirk & Spock Show but he steals this film. His glass half empty attitude and ever present expression of disgust are hilarious, and when he’s stuck on an unforgiving planet with the frank Spock for company the results are great fun. The two character’s bickering and underlying respect for each other works really well, and I enjoyed Bones coming out from the two star’s shadows.

Source
Unbeknownst to each other Kirk and Spock share the same inner crises, as they both question whether trawling through infinite space is actually what they want (or are meant) to be doing any more. More is made of this conflict for Kirk, although still not enough for me. It’s an interesting story but one that isn’t really brought up again after the first act until the very end as the film makes way for action set piece after action set piece. Therein lies the film’s greatest strength and weakness. When the action is good, it’s really good, but it leaves little room for the character or story to breath, and they’re left impatiently rushing through the bits in between as they try to explain why all this is happening. I found the multiple short cuts one after another really distracting a bit exhausting to watch, and the shaky cam used in the fight scenes leaves you asking who actually hit who. Maybe I’m thinking too much about this too, but how characters conveniently managed to bump in to each other in the middle of a planet was a bit daft. In the end, the reason why stuff’s happening becomes a bit of a side show and while we’re left with a great spectacle, it’s all a little shallow.

There are great nods to the late Leonard Nilmoy and Anton Yelchin (one for the latter right towards the end that was entirely unplanned, but heart breaking watching now). Sofia Boutella’s Jaylah is brilliant and an absolute baddass (looking forward to more of that in The Mummy reboot next year), and I really like the “controversial” character development added for Sulu. Idris Alba’s villain is a frustrating one looking back though. For about 80% of the time he is in it, there is absolutely no reason given for why he’s doing what he is and he comes across like a simple “I just want to kill everyone okay?” villain that is just there because he has to be. Then suddenly with 15/20 minutes to go we found out his backstory and suddenly we have an interesting character on our hands. It’s way too late though, and potential parallels with other characters aren’t made enough of and I felt like they had missed a real opportunity to have a memorable villain.

Source
As ever, the visuals in this are superb. The attack on the Enterprise, and the introduction to Yorktown, the new Starbase is breath-taking. I’ve read some criticism of the sets, particularly on the planet Altamid and while I see what they mean this didn’t bother me. I’m no Trekkie, but if anything some of the sets looked straight out the original series and that could be a good or a bad thing I guess. The score for this film is as brilliant as the first two, and there’s a great “classical music” choice later on that encapsulated how fun this reboot franchise can be. Star Trek Beyond is a perfectly good popcorn action movie, with some great dialogue and laugh out loud jokes. It’s probably the weakest of the three reboots, so I’m still waiting for a sequel that even comes close to the first, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a great ride.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kong: Skull Island (2017)

Source Although it only feels like Peter Jackson's King Kong was released a couple of years ago, it is now actually 12 years old. I'm going to blame ITV4 for confusing my timeline seeing as they have the remake on every single weekend, but it still feels very soon to be having another interpretation of the 1933 classic in cinemas. I remember watching the original during a school half term and being really surprised at how much I enjoyed it and it's now dated effects. There's a charm to the stop-motion special effects used so well in King Kong, and I think I've loved that style since the terrifying skeleton army in Jason and the Argonauts (1963). Jackson obviously took the special effects to another level in his 2005 remake, but I was pleased with how the heart of the story, and the tragedy of it remained. Kong is more than just a mindless monster that smashes and crashes in to things and Jackson captured that essence really well, even if the run time could have ...

Star Trek (2009) / Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)

Source Ahead of watching the new Star Trek film, Charlotte and I decided to go back and revisit JJ Abrams’ Star Wars audition and its sequel. The first I knew quite well, but I had only seen the second the once at the cinema, and it became one of many DVDs I have sat on my shelf still in its cellophane.  I’ve never been a Star Trek fan by any stretch. I’ve probably seen a little of the original series, and then the odd episode of Star Trek Next Generation TV series as a kid while waiting for The Simpsons, Robot Wars or Malcolm in the Middle to come on. I was always a big Star Wars fan and seemed to think you could only be in one camp or the other for some reason. As far as I’m aware Trekkie reception to the 2009 and 2013 reboots were largely positive bar the pretty one dimensional villain in the first, and the whitewashed return of a popular villain from the Star Trek canon in the sequel. This film seemed to cater for all though. If you wanted comedy, you got it in abundan...

Hacksaw Ridge (2017)

Source We're in the thick of Oscar buzz as the 2017 nominations were announced today.   Suicide Squad (2016) is now an Oscar nominated film (kill me), and a win for Lin-Manuel Miranda's 'How Far I'll Go?' in the brilliant Moana (2016) would make him the youngest ever EGOT winner (what am I doing with my life?).  Last night we caught a showing of a film that appears to be flying under the radar a bit.  I'm not sure if that's anything to do with it's director, Mel Gibson, and his previous misdemeanors, or just show how strong a year this year's line up really is (as a quick aside, I'm really pleased to see 2016's excellent Hell or High Water make the noms).  With the bar set as high as it is this year round in the Best Motion Picture category in particular, it's going to take a lot to surprise and shock.  Gibson's war epic, Hacksaw Ridge did both. Source Just as with Lion (2017) which we caught the night before , Hacksaw Ridg...