Skip to main content

Moneyball (2011)

Source
Directed by Bennett Miller, and written by Steven Zaillian and Aaron Sorkin, Moneyball is based on the Michael Lewis’ book of the same name (2003). Both tell the true story of Billy Beane, the general manager of Oakland Athletics baseball team, and played here by Brad Pitt (munching his way through the film like he’s back in Ocean’s Eleven). In 2002 he had the supposedly impossible task of making the team competitive on a shoestring budget after having had their best players pinched by their richer competition.

Source
As with many sports, the analysis of players in baseball was largely archaic, and focussed on scout opinion and little else. When some teams have over five times the budget available for wages and fees, Beane needed a way to close the gap. It wouldn’t be as simple as replacing players like for like. Even if there were players available good enough to directly replace the impact made by those he lost, then he would never be able to afford them. Its then that he met his future assistant, Peter Brand (Jonah Hill - interestingly the real name of Beane's assistant was Paul DePodesta, who asked that his name was changed in the film). The two of them used a statistical approach to player appointment, unearthing huge anomalies in scouting and decision making within the game. When appointing players, they ignored age, looks, what they did in their free time, and whether they walked or threw funny so long as their stats all added up to a successful team. It’s your classic underdog sports story, but with an interesting insight in to how they actually flipped the sport on its head.

I really enjoyed the dialogue and slow pace to Moneyball. It takes it’s time to tell its story, but if you don’t think you would enjoy two hours of people talking trying to sex up maths and sports then it does make this a hard sell. Saying that, alongside what I think is an incredible real life sporting story is that of a man struggling with the personal demons of past failures and a broken family. Brad Pitt’s superb in this, and fully deserved the Academy Award nomination he received that year. Although he’s easy to get behind, he does have flaws and I found myself sympathising with those he manages to antagonise. He rubs the noses of his respected scouting and coaching team in the blind optimism of his new transfer policy, and is point blank rude to his ex-wife’s new husband. Put simply though, he’s human, he’s relatable, and most importantly: believable. That’s why I find myself getting behind him every time I watch this film. I’m always fascinated by the psychology of sporting greats, and for Beane winning is never enough. There’s always one step further that he’s missed out on, and something to go for next time. It’s frustrating when those closest to him want him to revel in what he has achieved, but that is what drive people like him and I found that so absorbing about his character.

Alex moneyball bradpitt
Source
It’s a brilliantly directed film (something that will come of no surprise to anyone that has seen Bennett Miller’s Capote from 2005, or Foxcatcher from 2014), and the score is unobtrusive and subtly brilliant. When the electric guitar does dare to build you can’t help but be carried away with it. That guitar had a really similar feel to the score of Friday Night Lights actually, one of my favourite ever TV shows (and another underdog sports story). Pitt is surrounded by a brilliant supporting cast too. Needless to say that Philip Seymour Hoffman is entirely believable as the team’s coach, and I was really impressed with Ken Matlock as the head scout, a former player himself and technical advisor for the film. Chris Pratt’s solid, but the film’s other star is Jonah Hill in his first ‘serious’ role. Also receiving the first of his Academy Award nominations that year (first of many for him), Hill plays against type and is extremely reserved and awkward throughout. He’s a number cruncher, and is the man to offer Beane the analytical answers in his attempt to level the playing field. His struggle in handling stressful social interactions such as player transfer negotiations and firing current players are hilarious, and offer a good release to much of the tense and confrontational dialogue.

Source
I was inspired to watch this film (again) after listening to Episode 3 of the Revisionist History podcast, ‘The Big Man Can’t Shoot.’ In it, Malcolm Gladwell brilliantly tells the fascinating story of basketball legend Wilt Chamberlain. A superstar during his time, Chamberlain’s one fault is that he was awful at shooting from a foul throw situation (I thought of it a bit like a football penalty for anyone else whose basketball knowledge isn’t all that). Although all the stats show that throwing this shot underarm rather than overarm gives players a much greater chance of scoring, no professionals do. To do so would be a “Granny Shot,” or to shoot “like a sissy.” Chamberlain openly admitted that he would have scored hundreds more points in his career, and won more matches in the process had he changed how he made this shot. The podcast asks why every player ignores the stats, and the type of personality required to stand up and do something differently. Beane and DePodesta did just that, and the film that tells the story is a fascinating and inspiring watch.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Star Trek (2009) / Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)

Source Ahead of watching the new Star Trek film, Charlotte and I decided to go back and revisit JJ Abrams’ Star Wars audition and its sequel. The first I knew quite well, but I had only seen the second the once at the cinema, and it became one of many DVDs I have sat on my shelf still in its cellophane.  I’ve never been a Star Trek fan by any stretch. I’ve probably seen a little of the original series, and then the odd episode of Star Trek Next Generation TV series as a kid while waiting for The Simpsons, Robot Wars or Malcolm in the Middle to come on. I was always a big Star Wars fan and seemed to think you could only be in one camp or the other for some reason. As far as I’m aware Trekkie reception to the 2009 and 2013 reboots were largely positive bar the pretty one dimensional villain in the first, and the whitewashed return of a popular villain from the Star Trek canon in the sequel. This film seemed to cater for all though. If you wanted comedy, you got it in abundan...

Fences (2017)

Source Based on August Wilson's 1983 Pulitzer Prize-winning play, and adapted to screenplay before his death in 2005, Fences has been long in the waiting. There had been previous attempts adapt Fences to film (the rights were first purchased in 1987 with Eddie Murphy penciled in to star), but this had repeatedly been pushed back as Wilson remained adamant that it was directed by an African-American. Having directed twice before, and knowing the source material inside out from his Tony Award turn as the lead, Denzel Washington has taken the plunge and taken his place behind, as well as in front of the camera. With much of the stage cast reunited, including now Academy Award winner Viola Davis (also a Tony Award winner for the same role on stage) it is immediately apparent this has been made without a lot of love and respect for the original source material. Source Fences is a family drama in 1950s Pittsburgh, honing in on Troy Maxson (Washington), and his views on the...

Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016)

Source Tom Cruise and director Edward Zwick reunite after their successful 2003 collaboration, The Last Samurai, in the second of the Jack Reacher movie interpretations: Never Go Back.  If anyone actually got over the choice of Cruise to play Lee Child's title character of his long running novel series, they were left with a movie that had a lot going for it.  Unfortunately, it's follow up may have killed the franchise in it's tracks... [insert 'Never Go Back' pun].   Tom Cruise plays Jack Reacher, an ex army major who "they ran out of medals to give" but eventually decided to leave and live his life roaming the streets.  Never Go Back tells the story of his budding friendship with a current army major (Cobie Smulders), and his decision to go on the run with her when she is wrongly framed for espionage.   Source The books are a bit throw-away, but really good fun, and I enjoyed the two I've read.  Reacher's part investigator, part hard m...